Powered By Blogger

Saturday, October 15, 2011

The Original Faces of Death (1980) -Michael Carr (2)

Director: John Alan Schwartz




Genre:   Documentary | Horror


MPAA Rating: X


Running Time: 105 Mins


Tagline: "Banned In 46 Countries"




Synopsis:
{According to IMDB}
"A collection of death scenes, ranging from TV-material to home-made super-8 movies The common factor is death by some means."

discussion

I can’t believe that this is the documentary that was at one point banned in 46 countries; I really have a hard time believing it. Faces of Death, for one reason or another has become an infamous classic documentary (actually mockumentary) on the subject of death and afterlife. Most people who buy this movie are expecting: real, extreme, and gruesome footage of violence, carnage and ultimately…death. But when you actually sit down and watch this crap, you will notice that a vast majority of the footage is simulated. Roughly only 40% of the film is actually real “death” footage, the rest is a combination of footage that was simulated and inspired real events. In this review I will go over the plot and closely examine each scene presented in Faces of Death.


 
The footage for Faces of Death varies. I will try with my best judgment to explain which scenes are real and which are fake.  The director has said that only 40% is real, he will not elaborate which of those scenes are real. Since the director won’t elaborate, I will have to do so for the sake of argument. The movie is narrated by Dr Gross, a fake Doctor who has traveled the world, and is the one who collected the footage from the journeys he has done (so he claims) and explains with each scene what he witnessed and how little we have control over life, and that death is just around the corner.  The first shot is a surgery room where a patient is undergoing open heart surgery, this scene is in fact real, and it’s more than likely taken from operations done previously. The shot then transcends into the title credits and into more random shots of corpses in morgues; those scenes are also real. The opening credits conclude with an autopsy, I am positive that it is most likely real, I could be wrong.  The scenes followed involving dogs fighting, spiders attacking prey, snakes eating fish and indigenous people attacking animals is also real, but no different to what you would see in National Geographic The more gruesome scenes involving beheading of chickens, clubbing of seals, and cows at a slaughterhouse are the most difficult to watch, they are in fact real, they are all stock footage. Now there is a scene I would like to address that is entirely staged. The scene that I want to bring up is the infamous monkey brain scene, for some reason people think it is real, it is not, and it is actually staged.  The director himself admits that he could not get the actual footage on screen due to the fact that it is a common practice in Asian countries. To not face any issues with sues; he claims he decided to only film a simulated sequence.  The remaining footage involving a man on the beach dead after drinking too much and people committing suicide…I  have to say I am not sure, I think those could be real.  The one’s that are entirely fake are the alligator attack, the assignation of a politician, all the scenes involving the assassin Francois Jordan, and the ridiculous organ orgy scene.  The final scenes showing cadavers from World War 2 and the attacks on Vietnam are actual footage from that time, again stock footage neatly edited into Faces of Death. The remaining scenes involving the man parasailing some other cranial autopsy and an electric chair execution…I must say I am not sure. I leave that up to the audience to decide. I still think though, that the electric chair one has to be fake, it is illegal to shoot an execution here in the states. Anyways, let me know what you think, I would like to hear your insight on Faces of Death and it's sequels.



Faces of death was released during a time when internet was nonexistent. Websites like rotten.com and other macabre web pages weren’t available. This film broke the barrier at the time to show gruesome footage. The issue is that they marketed the film as an actual documentary, when by now the director himself has said that only some scenes are in fact real. The question is why go through the trouble of lying to the public? Why lie about it? Why not just release it as a fake death compilation? All good questions, but at the end of the day…Death is something that we are all curious about. Not just that, I think everyone, deep down inside, is sick enough to want to see what happened to someone during a brutal car accident, or a shark attack. In many ways, I don’t blame the director for releasing it as a real documentary. It serves people’s right to not tamper nor explores what will eventually happen to everyone inevitably.




Monday, October 10, 2011

Satan’s Baby Doll (1982)- Jacqueline Dupré (0)

Director: Mario Bianchi


Genre: Horror

MPAA Rating: Unrated

Running Time: 75 Mins

Tagline: "Tender Young Flesh Seduced By The Ultimate Evil"
I was at a friend’s house and saw this movie in his collection, I was immediately mesmerized and hypnotized b y the cover. He told me not to bother, that it’s not worth the 30 dollars he paid for it. Regardless of his warnings…I ended up borrowing it…Now I wish I had actually listened to him.
 
The cover (which looks devilish at the least) is the only thing that is not in the movie. There is no Satan and no baby doll in sight.  The cover is just a misleading marketing tactic to get you to watch the movie. The real story is about a family feud and weird rituals. The best thing about this movie is the nudity, there is plenty of it. The score is also very unique and haunting, I actually want to find the soundtrack if its available. But anyway, the movie is excruciating to watch, I think this is a movie for someone who wants to get high and just see random scenes of rituals and nude babes. Sure the nudity is great, but after a while, it gets boring and repetitive.

For an Italian horror film this is really bad. I am actually glad I didn’t pay the 30 dollars for it. I will leave a trailer for the movie, so you can see there is no sign of Satan. I was actually hoping he would pop out, that’s the only reason I saw it until the end. Avoid it by all means.


Wednesday, October 5, 2011

Man Beast (1956)- Rock Madison (0)

Director: Jerry Warren

Stars: Rock Madison, Asa Maynor and George Skaff

Genre: Horror/Sci-Fi

MPAA Rating: Unrated

Running Time: 65 Mins

Tagline: "Sub-Human Monsters Go on A Rampaging Blood-Binge"



“Take me away Steve! Take me away from this place!” These are the last lines spoken by the female protagonist, who by the way has the most masculine voice I have ever heard in a woman.  How this movie got made is something I am still pondering on. I can imagine the writers sitting down and thinking about what other creature they can bring to the screen that hasn’t been experimented with before. I guess the only one they could come up was the yeti. Don’t get me wrong, the yeti can be a threatening character, he even looks half decent in this movie, and the issue is not so much the yeti, but the acting and pacing of the film.
The movie is extremely, extremely, extremely boooooooring. I mean I cannot emphasize how slow and uninteresting the movie was. I really wanted to like it, I tend to like crap like this…but for God sake they could have made the movie more interesting. The other issue is the acting. These “actors” have no clue how to express the correct emotions in a film; many are actually trying to hold their laughter due to the implausible script they had to deal with, and of course lousy plot and script.

The plot, which is laughable, is about a group of people in search of the missing brother of the leading protagonist (the female with the man voice) after they find their brother, they discover they are on the trail for the yeti (a big giant snow version of big foot) TWIST AND TURNS GO ABOUT IN THIS FILM!! not really, actually its downright silly and ultimately boring. You only see the yeti 3 times at most in the entire picture, and he doesn’t do that much harm. Honestly, I do love these old 50’s sci-fi cheese, but this was was a big sleeper…like a freaking night quill.

The American (2010) George Clooney (5) [Top 250]

Director:Anton Corbijn

Stars: George Clooney, Paolo Bonacelli and Violante Placido

Genre: Action/Drama/Thriller

MPAA Rating: R

Running Time: 110 Mins



 



I can understand why most people didn’t like The American. The biggest problem this film faced upon release was the advertisement; presented as the next Bourne or Bond film. After viewing the film, it’s very obvious that it has a completely different tone to most recent action/espionage films. So if you’re thinking of obtaining or renting the film expecting an action/adventure extravaganza, then you will be gravely disappointed.  The film’s tone is more of a European Spy Thriller, with an independent filmmaking approach. Had the film been advertised differently, then perhaps the box office gross wouldn’t have been affected as much.

 
The American tells the story of a private man named Jack (also goes by the name of Edward) the audience never really gets to see the true nature of the character, all we know is he is dedicated to building weapons for high paying assassins. Aside building them, he at times even has to pull the trigger for his assignments.  Residing in Rome, he takes the assignment to build a long distance Rugger Mini-14 Custom.  While constructing the weapon for his client, we see Jack/Edward walk around Rome, mostly paranoid, worried that his past will come back to haunt him. The only “friend” he makes in his stay is a nosey priest named Father Benedetto; who is interested in the private life of Jack.  The scenes with the priest and Jack are perhaps the most entertaining. You get to see two different aspects of life, one from the prospective of a man dedicated to God, the other dedicated to abandonment, isolation, and murder. 


Aside the priest, he meets Clara; a prostitute who falls in love with Jack/Edward. They both begin a troubling relationship, that as the film progresses, you hope it will last. By troubling I refer to the fact that Jack doesn’t trust anyone, he even believes at one point that Clara might be the one who is hired to take him out. Evidently, she isn’t involved; she is actually genuinely interested in him. So thorough the film we explore the mind of an assassin who is trying to abandon his past, and start anew…but as mentioned, with part debts, and mistrust makes it all that more difficult for him. Lastly, I will like to mention, that I highly recommend this movie to anyone interested in a well-developed plot driven film. Yes, the film may have a slow pace and perhaps even predictable plot, but thanks to the director’s style and magnificent European landscapes, the film succeeds where others fail.


                                              
 VIDEO
I dont care what you say about the movie, the video presentation is impecable. this is defeinetly a movie to show off to your friends in an HDTV. All the landscapes, the flesh tones, and scenery is impressive. I couldnt get my eyes of the screem, lieterally I was just astonished at how the movie looked. Not one scene looks out of focus, or in poor shape. 

AUDIO
Just like the video presentation, the audio is amazingly powerful, boating a 5.1 DTS HD Master Audio. The movie doesnt have any explosions or much firing throught, however, the atmospheric sounds and the minimal action make this audio impressive. 

BOTTOM LINE
In all, I have to say that due to poor advertising the movie did not recieve the recognition it deserved. But, dont dismiss this movie due to that. I would give it a chance, I loved the films slw and atmospheric pacing. If you are into slow, plot driven film, then look no further this film is for you. Gauranteed.












Saturday, September 24, 2011

Navajo Joe (1966)- Burt Reynolds (3 ½ )

Director: Sergio Corbucci

Stars: Burt Reynolds, Aldo Sambrell and Nicoletta Machiavelli

Genre: Western

MPAA Rating:  R

Running Time: 92 Mins

Tagline:" Relentless in his vengeance! Deadly in his violence"





I stumbled upon this movie because I found out that Quentin Tarrantino had used the score of this movie on Kill Bill. I had already seen a case of this when he used a piece of the score of another Spaghetti Western (Death Rides A Horse) and I will admit I was initially very upset at this notion. I don’t like when directors or writers steal material from other films. But when I come to think of it, it is part of Tarantino’s style to use scores and even actors from these older films. I see it as a form of homage, paying tribute to the films that will never be again.

The movie begins with the massacre of a small tribe of Indians. From the tribe, a survivor seeks out revenge on the men who brutally murdered the innocent people of the tribe. Navajo Joe is peculiar in that it stars Burt Reynolds as a Native American Indian. Initially I didn’t buy the whole thing of a white man playing the character of an Indian; Reynolds however pulls it off, unlike William Shatner who did a horrible job in White Comanche. Anyway, the plot isn’t too complex; the only complexity they add is story about these criminals seeking a safe of money. Even if simple and formulaic, it works wonders, thanks to the cinematography and wonderful score by Ennio Morricone.

Navajo Joe is one of countless spaghetti westerns that were released during the golden time of the era. It actually came out the same year as The Good, the Bad & the Ugly. It wasn’t as popular, even if it was directed by Sergio Corbucci. I wouldn’t miss this forgotten and underrated western. Like I said don’t expect any form of originality out of this western; it is quite generic and predictable. I will leave a link down below so you can hear the score that plays in this movie, which was later used in Kill Bill.  Let me know what you guys thought, I always appreciate comments.